Press and Information Division
PRESS RELEASE N° 28/01
10 July 2001
Opinion of Advocate General Philippe Léger in Case C-353/99 P
Council of the Union v Hautala
ADVOCATE GENERAL LÉGER PROPOSES THAT THE COURT OF JUSTICE
SHOULD UPHOLD THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF
19 JULY 1999 GIVING A RIGHT OF PARTIAL ACCESS TO COUNCIL
DOCUMENTS AND SO DISMISS THE COUNCIL'S APPEAL
In the light of the right of public access to documents given in the Charter of Fundamental
Rights of the European Union, the Advocate General concludes that there should be no
exceptions to the right of partial access unless it would involve insuperable administrative
difficulties, and then only subject to judicial review
In its decision of 4 November 1997 the Council refused Mrs Hautala access to the report on the
ground that it contained sensitive information and disclosure of that information could be harmful
for the European Union's relations with third countries. Under Community law on access to
documents, the Council may refuse access to a document in order to protect the public interest
with regard to international relations.
On 19 July 1999 the Court of First Instance annulled the Council decision and ruled that the
Council should consider allowing partial access to documents. The Council, supported by Spain,
lodged an appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance; Mrs HAUTALA was
supported by Denmark, France, Finland and the United Kingdom.
Advocate General Léger delivers his Opinion in that case today.
The Opinion of the Advocate General is not binding on the Court. It is the role of the Advocates General to propose to the Court, in complete independence, a legal solution to the case assigned to them.
The Advocate General notes first of all that the strength of the principle of access to documents
derives from the fact that it is a fundamental right. He notes that the principle of public access
to Council documents was laid down in a decision of 1993, which was intended to introduce a
measure of transparency into the operation of the institutions. Various European Councils, in his
view, reaffirmed that determination to enable citizens to have the fullest possible access to
information. A code of conduct was also adopted by the Council and the Commission and the
Treaty of Amsterdam itself established the right of access to documents of the European
Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
The Advocate General refers expressly to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European
Union, which provides for a right of access to such documents. He sees this as establishing the
principle of transparency and as one of the surest methods of involving citizens in the
management of public affairs.
In his view, the Charter placed the rights contained in it among the highest values common to the
Member States, thirteen of which have, moreover, given substance to that principle by adopting
general rules providing a right for the public to have access to documents held by the
administration.
The Advocate General examines the idea of a "document". In his view, the right of access
concerns the content of a document and not its substantive form: the objective is to have access
to the information contained in the actual documents.
Although he considers that some requirements may justify restricting the right of access, in
particular where national defence is concerned, he considers it necessary to make sure that such
restrictions of a fundamental principle (which must always be interpreted narrowly) remain in
proportion to the objective being sought (protection of the public interest).
In that regard, he believes that the Council's refusal to consider the possibility of partial access
to documents clearly conflicts with the principle of proportionality. This "all or nothing"
approach does not appear to him to be in accordance with the nature of the right of access to
documents as a fundamental right. The extra work for the Council involved in identifying
information which can be disclosed within a document does not in principle justify depriving
citizens of the right to have partial access to information.
The Advocate General adds that the widespread exercise of that right in very many Member States
does not generally pose insuperable problems.
The Advocate General proposes therefore that a right of partial access to documents should
be given. He suggests that an exception to the right of partial access should be allowed only
where the administrative constraints which justify it are insuperable, and that the way the exception
is applied should be subject to judicial review.
Available in all languages.
For the full text of the Opinion, please consult our Internet page www.curia.eu.int
For further information please contact Fionnuala Connolly:
Tel: (00 352) 4303 3355; Fax: (00 352) 4303 2731 |