PRESS RELEASE No 29/02
Date 20 March 2002
Judgment of the Court of First Instance in the Case T-175/99
UPS Europe SA v Commission, supported by Deutsche Post SA
UP Europe SA (established in Belgium) is one of the United Parcels Service
group of companies which distributes parcels throughout the world.
It has office in all the Member States of the European Communities, including
Germany, and is in competition with DHL International Ltd ("DHL").
On 11 May 1998 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration
by which Deutsche Post AG (established in Germany) sought to acquire, by the
purchase of 22.498% of DHL's shares, control of that company jointly with Deutsche
Lufthansa AG and Japanese Airlines Company Ltd.
By decision of 26 June 1998, the Commission declared that concentration compatible
with the common market.
Notwithstanding that decision, UPL maintained its earlier complaint of abuse,
by Deutsche Post in particular, of a dominant position on the common market,
prohibited by the Treaty
UPS claimed that Deutsche Post was able to acquire the shares in DHL only
as a result of the revenue it obtained on the reserved postal market and that
it was not entitled to use its exclusive rights for purposes other than complying
with its obligation to provide the service of general economic interest with
which it was entrusted.
By decision of 10 June 1999, the Commission rejected the complaint.
UPS brought an action before the Court of First Instance for annulment of
that decision.
The Court of First Instance has dismissed the action. It held, first,
that the fact that an exclusive right is granted to an undertaking does not
preclude that undertaking from earningprofits from the activities reserved to
it and does not preclude it from extending its activities into non-reserved
areas.
However, the Court of First Instance held that the funds deriving from the
monopoly, and used for the acquisition, must not derive from excessive prices
or other unfair practices on the reserved postal market. Where there are grounds
for suspecting an abuse of a dominant position, it is necessary to examine the
source of the funds employed.
In the present case, UPS had not proved any abusive practice on the part of
Deutsche Post on the reserved letter market and the fact that Deutsche Post
possessed funds for acquiring the shares in DHL did not imply the existence
of abusive conduct on the reserved market.
Note: An appeal, limited to points of law, may be brought before the Court
of Justice against the judgment of the Court of First Instance within two months
from its notification.
Unofficial document for media use only; not binding on the Court of First Instance. Available in all official Community languages. For the full text of the judgment, please consult our Internet page For further information please contact Fionnuala Connolly: Tel: (00 352) 4303 3355; Fax: (00 352) 4303 2731 |