INFORMATION FOR THE PRESS No 42/02
8 May 2002
HEARING IN CASE C-206/01
Arsenal Football Club and Matthew Reed
Since 1989, Arsenal has registered the word trade marks 'Arsenal' and
'Gunners' and the shield and cannon devices for a class of products comprising
articles of outer clothing, articles of sports clothing and footwear. Arsenal
designs and supplies its own products or has them made and supplied by its network
of approved resellers.
Since its commercial and promotional activities in the field of sales of souvenirs
and memorabilia under those marks have developed greatly in recent years and
provide it with substantial income, Arsenal has also sought to ensure that 'official'
products (products manufactured by it or with its authorisation) may be identified
clearly, and has endeavoured to persuade its supporters to buy official products
only. In addition, the club has brought legal proceedings against traders selling
unofficial products.
For 31 years Mr Reed has sold football souvenirs and memorabilia, almost all
marked with one or more Arsenal emblems. Mr Reed, who owns several stalls located
outside the grounds of Highbury, Arsenal's stadium, was able to obtain from
KT Sports, licensed by Arsenal to sell its products to vendors around Highbury,
only very small quantities of official Arsenal products. In 1991 and 1995 Arsenal
had unofficial articles of Mr Reed's confiscated.
Arsenal considered that by selling the unofficial scarves Mr Reed had both
committed 'passing off'1 and infringed its trade marks. It therefore
brought proceedings against him in the High Court of Justice of England and
Wales, Chancery Division.
The High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, decided
to refer to the Court of Justice of the European Communities for a preliminary
ruling on the question whether or not non-trade mark use can constitute
infringement of registered trade mark rights.
The hearing in the present proceedings will take place in plenary
session at 9.30 a.m. on 14 May 2002. A report for the hearing
will be available in the language of the procedure (English).
Please note the following;
* the use of mobile phones or other loud electronic devices is not permitted
during the hearing;
* the public is requested to remain quiet and seated throughout the hearing
or ceremony;
* photography and filming are authorised only at the very beginning of the
hearing (seating of the President and parties only);
* the use of flash or supplementary lighting systems is not permitted;
* if numerous photographers and cameramen are interested, a "pool"
may be arranged by the Press and Information Division;
* photographers and cameramen may not move around the hearing room in order
to take photographs or to film;
* press are asked to use the Thomas More entrance, Boulevard Konrad Adenauer.
Name:
|
|
Press Agency / Organisation:
|
|
Contact number (Tel):
|
(Fax): |
Number of persons: |
|
Do you seek authorisation to
photograph? (Please delete as appropriate) Yes No |
|
Do you seek authorisation to
film? (Please delete as appropriate) Yes No |
In principle, your application will be accepted, unless you are otherwise informed by the Court.
1 A cause of action in tort against the conduct of a third party which is misleading in such a way that a large number of persons have believed or been led to believe that articles sold by the third party are those of the claimant or are sold with his authorisation or have a commercial association with him.