PRESS RELEASE No 111/03
3 December 2003
Judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-208/01
Volkswagen A.G. v Commission of the European Communities
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ANNULS THE COMMISSION'S DECISION DECLARING VOLKSWAGEN'S COMMERCIAL PRACTICES
WITH REGARD TO ITS GERMAN DEALERS UNLAWFUL
The Commission did not prove an agreement between the automobile manufacturer and its
authorised dealers to fix a selling price by prohibiting discounts on a new
model.
Acting on a consumer's complaint, the Commission held that such initiatives were anticompetitive,
since their purpose was to eliminate, among the dealers, competition by discounts. Having
concluded that there was an agreement contravening competition law, the Commission, by a
decision of 2001, fined Volkswagen 30.96 million Euros.
Volkswagen disputed, having infringed the rules of free competition, before the Court of
First Instance, arguing, in particular, that its initiatives with regard to its dealers
were unilateral. There was therefore no agreement between the parties.
The Court of First Instance recalls, first of all, in line with its
caselaw, that the Commission may not decide that unilateral conduct by a manufacturer,
in the context of its contractual relations with its retailers, in reality forms
the basis of an anticompetitive agreement unless it establishes express or implied acquiescence
by the retailers in the attitude adopted by the manufacturer.
The Court of First Instance finds, also, that the Commission did not prove
any actual acquiescence by the dealers in Volkswagen's calls when they became aware
of them. The Commission decided that such proof was not necessary, since the
dealers had, by signing a dealership agreement, tacitly acquiesced in such calls.
The Court finds, however, that the compliance with Community competition law of the
dealership agreement signed by the dealer's is undisputed.
The Court finds therefore that the Commission's position amounts to claiming that a
dealer who has signed a dealership agreement which complies with competition law is
deemed, upon and by such signature, to have accepted in advance a later
unlawful variation of that contract, even though, by virtue precisely of its compliance
with competition law, that contract could not enable the dealer to foresee such
a variation.
The Court rejects such position as contrary to the requirement to prove a
concurrence of wills. The signature of the dealership agreement by Volkswagen's dealers could
not be regarded as implied acceptance, given in advance, of Volkswagen's anticompetitive initiatives.
Since no agreement was proved, the Court has annulled the Commission's decision imposing
a fine on Volkswagen A.G.
Reminder: An appeal against the decision of the CFI, limited to points of
law, can be brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities
within two months of delivery.
Unofficial document, for media use only, which does not bind the Court of First Instance. Available languages: DE, ES, EN, FR, IT. The full text of the judgment can be found on the internet (www.curia.eu.int ). In principle it will be available from midday CET on the day of delivery. For additional information please contact Christopher Fretwell Tel: (00352) 4303 3355 Fax: (00352) 4303 2731. |
Commission Decision of 29 June 2001 in Case COMP/F-2/36.693 Volkswagen (OJ 2001
L 262, p. 14)